Code only where the platform needs it — written to survive the next developer.
What you get
- Bulk-safe Apex that holds under production volume
- Test classes that assert behaviour, not just hit a coverage number
- Reusable LWC components built on your design system
- Source-driven delivery with CI validation on every pull request
What usually brings people to us
Code written against the coverage minimum
Test classes that create a record, run the trigger and assert nothing. Coverage passes, regressions ship.
Logic scattered across triggers
Multiple triggers per object with business logic inline, so execution order is undefined and reuse is impossible.
Change-set deployments
Manual component picking, no version history, no rollback, and no way to know what is actually in production.
What we deliver
- 01
Apex engineering
Single trigger per object with a handler pattern, service and selector layers, bulkified DML, async processing through Queueable and Batch, and explicit CRUD/FLS enforcement.
- 02
Lightning Web Components
Accessible, reusable components with wire adapters, Lightning Data Service, imperative Apex where needed, and Jest tests.
- 03
Legacy modernisation
Visualforce and Aura migrated to LWC, Workflow Rules and Process Builder consolidated into Flow, and technical debt retired in prioritised order.
- 04
DevOps
Salesforce DX project structure, scratch-org development, CI validation on pull requests, and repeatable deployments with rollback.
Typical stack
- Apex
- Lightning Web Components
- SOQL / SOSL
- Flow
- Salesforce DX
- Jest
- GitHub Actions
- Scratch orgs
Related work
- Technology & SaaS
A partner portal with a sharing model that passed security review
Replacing an email-and-spreadsheet partner process with a branded Experience Cloud portal — deal registration, pipeline visibility and document access, on a least-privilege sharing model.
Read case study - Finance & Fintech
Rebuilding integrations that were silently losing records
A set of synchronous, fire-and-forget callouts rebuilt as resilient, observable interfaces with retry, idempotency and reconciliation reporting.
Read case study
Custom Development — common questions
We target meaningful assertions on positive, negative and bulk paths rather than a percentage. Coverage typically lands well above the 75% deployment requirement as a side effect.
Yes. We start with a static analysis and architecture review, then agree a remediation order so the highest-risk code is addressed before new features land on top of it.
Related services
Have a custom development problem worth solving?
Send us the specifics — current state, what has been tried, and what success looks like. You will get a considered technical response, not a brochure.
24/7 support — response within one business hour